Running across the kindergarten playground, a group of five us held hands in one giant line. There was no purpose to the game, if you can even call it that. No one won, and no one lost. But at that moment we were having fun, which explained the three other times we restarted the “game.” Each time going to the school wall, grabbing hands with the person next to you, and running. Certainly if we ran to a place, some predetermined line, maybe it could be a race; but that was not what we were doing. We ran until we were laughing so much that we couldn’t run any further. And that was enough for us.
Childish? Naive? We were kids. For the most part that’s all most people need to know. We were best friends, and at that moment it explained our every move. In truth, besides our attempt at creating a pointless new game, our little group was quite bureaucratic. We had two elected leaders, Kevin and Hannah. We chose them because they were the best suited for the job. We chose them because they were the most outspoken of all of us. We chose them because everybody liked them. And we chose them because we figured we need one boy and one girl leading us. It seems even in a group of five year olds, equal representation was a must.
Kevin and Hannah’s job was mediation. It rested on their shoulders to decide which games we played during recess. This isn’t to say our group of friends was a monarchy, we did think to limit their power. Each day there was a new Special Person…unfortunately though we were strong with governmental policies, our creativity lacked. The Special Person was one of the rest of us who got to pick the one game they wanted to play that day. It was a way for the rest of us to have a voice. Yet probably the most sophisticated aspect of our little group was my role in the hierarchy of friends.
It was my job to replace Kevin if he ever abdicated his position, or was just absent that day. There was also a girl to follow Hannah, and two more to follow behind us. Our roles showed a foresight not normally attributed to five year olds because of the basic insight to see the imperfection of life. We understood, without knowing why, that there might come a day when our hierarchy would falter, and we took precautions to alleviate any adversities. Our roles gave us a sense of importance, not only did we belong but we had a purpose. When we had created the group our first act, after creating our positions, was to name the organization. This too, like everything else, we did logically: by a vote. We each came up with an idea, and when we were done we voted on whose was best.
The rest of the kindergarten class envied us. Coming together as one group meant childhood power. We were exclusive and our numbers stayed the same. Exclusiveness was our attraction, and everyone wanted in. Every kid in our grade knew who was in our group; we were basically five-year-old royalty. We reveled in the attention that we got for being part of this club. Soon Kevin and Hannah’s authority spread beyond our little group. They became the spokespeople for our grade. Later they would write a letter the next year to President Clinton on behalf of our entire school. I was quickly seen as the represeentative to both, and I was their official delegate to the class.
After our bureaucracy was complete, our group legitimized, and all the positions were securely understood—we played. That day we ran, for no reason, other then we were happy. Other days we played tag, soccer, or just sat against the school wall laughing. No matter what we did, our first objective as an organization was fun. We chose from the very beginning our roles, we chose who would fill them, and then when our minds drifted we chose a few weeks later to move on and forget about our group for a new set of friends.
:j <converse no iron-jawed thwarter>

